In the design of portal frames and other steel structures, moment-resisting bases can be provided if large lateral forces and bending moments are anticipated. This can lead to the economical design of the frame members, but the base will have to be carefully designed as a moment-resisting connection. Therefore such bases are expected to transfer bending moment and axial forces between the steel members and the concrete substructure. Depending on the direction of the moment and the magnitude, base plates can be symmetric or asymmetric.

For the design of moment-resisting base plates, the smallest diameter of bolts to be considered should be M20, even though M30 bolts are deemed the most appropriate. Larger bolts in smaller numbers are usually more preferable. All holding down bolts should be provided with an embedded anchor plate for the head of the bolt to bear against. The sizes of anchor plates are chosen so as not to apply stress of more than 30 N/mm^{2} at the concrete interface, assuming 50% of the plate is embedded in concrete. When the moments and forces are high, the holding-down system may need to be designed in conjunction with the reinforcement in the base.

**Design Methodology**

The design methodology for a moment-resisting base plate connection involves using iterative approach/experience to select the best base dimensions and bolt configuration. This arrangement is then evaluated for their resistance against the anticipated actions from the superstructure. In EN 1993-1-1:2005, the resistance of a base plate subjected to bending moment and axial force is assumed to be provided by two T-stubs, one in tension, and the other in compression. The resistance of the stub in tension is assumed to be provided by the holding down bolts, while the resistance of the stub in compression is assumed to be provided by a compression zone in the concrete, which is concentric with the column flange as shown below.

The design verification of a moment-resisting base plate therefore involves the following steps;

**STEP 1**

Evaluate the design forces in the equivalent T-stubs for both flanges. For a flange in compression, the force may be assumed to be concentric with the flange. For a flange in tension, the force is assumed to be along the line of the holding down bolts.

**STEP 2**

Evaluate the resistance of the equivalent T-stub in compression.

**STEP 3**

Evaluate the resistance of the equivalent T-stub in tension

**STEP 4**

Verify the adequacy of the shear resistance of the connection.

**STEP 5**

Verify the adequacy of the welds in the connection.

**STEP 6**

Verify the anchorage of the holding down bolts.

**Design Example**

Verify the capacity of the base plate arrangement in grade S275 steel shown below to resist the following actions;

M_{Ed }= 125 kNm

N_{Ed} = -870 kN (compression)

V_{Ed }= 100 kN

**Column**

From data tables for 254 x 254 x 132 UKC in S355

Depth h_{c} = 276.3 mm

Width b_{c} = 261.3 mm

Flange thickness t_{f,c} = 25.3 mm

Web thickness t_{w,c} = 15.3 mm

Root radius r_{c} = 12.7 mm

Elastic modulus (y-y axis) W_{el,y,c} = 1630000 mm^{3}

Plastic modulus (y-y axis) W_{pl,y,c} = 1870000 mm^{3}

Area of cross section A_{c }= 16800 mm^{2}

Depth between flanges h_{w,c} = h_{c} – 2 t_{f,c} = 276.3 – (2 x 25.3) = 200.4 mm

**Base plate**

Steel grade S275

Depth h_{bp} = 500 mm

Gross width b_{g,bp} = 500 mm

Thickness t_{bp} = 50 mm

**Concrete**

The concrete grade used for the base is C30/37

**Bolts**

M24 8.8 bolts

Diameter of bolt shank d = 24 mm

Diameter of hole d_{0} = 26 mm

Shear area (per bolt) A_{s} = 353 mm^{2}

Number of bolts either side n = 3

**MATERIAL STRENGTHS**

*Column and base plate*

The National Annex to BS EN 1993-1-1 refers to BS EN 10025-2 for values of nominal yield and ultimate strength. When ranges are given the lowest value should be adopted.

For S355 steel and 16 < t_{f,c }< 40 mm

Column yield strength f_{y,c }= R_{eH} = 345 N/mm^{2}

Column ultimate strength f_{u,c} = R_{m} = 470 N/mm^{2}

For S275 steel and t_{bp} > 40 mm

Base plate yield strength f_{y,bp} = R_{eH} = 255 N/mm^{2}

Base plate ultimate strength f_{u,bp} = R_{m }= 410 N/mm^{2}

**Concrete**

For concrete grade C30/37

Characteristic cylinder strength f_{ck} = 30 MPa = 30 N/mm^{2}

The design compressive strength of the concrete is determined from:

f_{cd} = α_{cc}f_{ck}/γ_{c}

f_{cd} = (0.85 x 30)/1.5 = 17 N/mm^{2}

For typical proportions of foundations, conservatively assume:

f_{jd} = f_{cd} = 17 N/mm^{2}

**Bolts**

For 8.8 bolts

Nominal yield strength f_{yb} = 640 N/mm^{2}

Nominal ultimate strength f_{ub} = 800 N/mm^{2}

**PARTIAL FACTORS FOR RESISTANCE**

**Structural steel**

γ_{M0} = 1.0

γ_{M1} = 1.0

γ_{M2} = 1.1

**Parts in connections**

γ_{M2} = 1.25 (bolts, welds, plates in bearing)

**DISTRIBUTION OF FORCES AT THE COLUMN BASE **

The design moment resistance of the base plate depends on the resistances of two T-stubs, one for each flange of the column. Whether each T-stub is in tension or compression depends on the magnitudes of the axial force and bending moment. The design forces for each situation are therefore determined first.

**Forces in column flanges**

Forces at flange centroids, due to moment:

N_{L,f} = M_{Ed}/(h – t_{f}) = [125/(276.3 – 25.3)] x 10^{3} = 498 kN (tension)

N_{R,f} = -M_{Ed}/(h – t_{f}) = -[125/(276.3 – 25.3)] x 10^{3} = -498 kN (compression)

**Forces due to axial force:**

N_{L,f} = N_{R,f} = N_{Ed}/2 = -870/2 = -435 kN**Total force:**

N_{L,f} = 498 – 435 = 63 kN (tension)

N_{R,f} = – 498 – 435 = -933 kN (compression)

In this case, the left side is in tension and the right side is in compression. The resistances of the two T-stubs will, therefore, be centred along the lines shown below:

**Forces in T-stubs of the base plate**

Assuming that tension is resisted on the line of the bolts and that compression is resisted concentrically under the flange in compression, the lever arms from the column centre can be calculated as follows:

z_{t }= 380/2 = 190 mm

z_{c} = (276.3 – 25.3)/2 = 125.5 mm

In this design situation, the left flange is in tension and the right in compression.

Therefore, z_{L} = z_{t} and z_{R} = z_{c}

N_{LT }= [M_{Ed}/(z_{L} + z_{R})] + [(N_{Ed} x z_{R})/(z_{L} + z_{R})] = [350/(190 + 125.5)] x 10^{3} + [-(870 x 190)/(190 + 125.5)] = 585.42 kN

N_{RT }= -[M_{Ed}/(z_{L} + z_{R})] + [(N_{Ed} x z_{L})/(z_{L} + z_{R})] = -[350/(190 + 125.5)] x 10^{3} + [-(870 x 125)/(190 + 125.5)] = -1454 kN

**RESISTANCE OF EQUIVALENT T-STUBS**

**Resistance of compression T-stub**

The resistance of a T-stub in compression is the lesser of:

- The resistance of concrete in compression under the flange (F
_{c,pl,Rd}) - The resistance of the column flange and web in compression (F
_{c,fc,Rd})

Compressive resistance of concrete below the column flange. The effective bearing area of the joint depends on the additional bearing width, as shown below.

Determine the available additional bearing width (c), which depends on the plate thickness, plate strength and joint strength.

c = t_{bp} x [√f_{ybp}/(3f_{jd}γ_{M0})] = 50 x [√255/(3 x 17 x 1.0)] = 112 mm

Thus the dimensions of the bearing area are,

b_{eff} = 2c + t_{fc} = (2 x 112) + 25.3 = 249.3 mm

l_{eff} = 2c + b_{c} = (2 x 112) + 261.3 = 485.3 mm

Area of bearing is,

A_{eff }= 249.3 x 485.3= 120985 mm^{2}

Thus, the compression resistance of the foundation is,

F_{c,pl,Rd }= A_{eff}f_{jd}

F_{c,pl,Rd} = 120985 x 17 x 10^{-3} = 2057 kN, > N_{R,T} = 1454 kN (maximum value).

This is therefore satisfactory

**Resistance of the column flange and web in compression**

The resistance of the column flange and web in compression is determined from:

F_{c,fcRd} = M_{c,Rd}/(h_{c} – t_{fc})

M_{c,Rd} is the design bending resistance of the column cross-section = 645 kNm (see page 402 of P363)

If V_{Ed} > V_{c,Rd}/2, the effect of shear should be allowed for

V_{c,Rd }= 705 kN (see page 234 of P363)

V_{Ed} = 100 kN

By inspection:

V_{Ed }< V_{c,Rd}/2

Therefore, the effects of shear may be neglected and hence

M_{c,Rd }= 645 kNm

F_{c,fcRd} = [(645 x 10^{6})/(276.3 – 25.3)] x 10-3 = 2569.4 kN

As, F_{c,pl,Rd} < F_{c,fc,Rd} the compression resistance of the right hand T-stub is:

F_{c,pl,Rd} = 2057 kN

F_{c,pl,Rd}> N_{R,T} = 1454 kN Satisfactory

**RESISTANCE OF TENSION T-STUB**

The resistance of the T-stub in tension is the lesser of:

- The base plate in bending under the left column flange, and
- The column flange/web in tension

**Resistance of base plate in bending**

The design resistance of the tension T-stub is given by:

F_{t,pl,Rd} = F_{t,Rd }= min{F_{T,1-2,Rd}; F_{T,3,Rd}}

Where F_{T,1-2,Rd} is the ‘Mode 1 / Mode 2’ resistance in the absence of prying and F_{T,3,Rd} is the Mode 3 resistance (bolt failure).

F_{T,1-2,Rd} = 2M_{Pl,1,Rd}/m

M_{Pl,1,Rd} = (0.25∑l_{eff,1}t_{bp}^{2}f_{ybp})/γ_{M0}

∑l_{eff,1} = is the effective length of the T-stub, which is determined from the equations below;

b_{p} = 500 mm

p = 190 mm

e = 60 mm

e_{x} = 60 mm

m_{x} = 52 mm

n = 3 (number of rows of bolt)

**Non-circular patterns**

- Single curvature; l
_{eff,nc}= b_{p}/2 = 500/2 = 250 mm - Individual end yielding; l
_{eff,nc}= 0.2n(4m_{x}+ 1.25e_{x}) = 1.5(4 x 52 + 1.25 x 60) = 424.5 mm - Corner yielding of outer bolts, individual yielding between; l
_{eff}= 2m_{x}+ 0.625e_{x}+ e + (n – 2)(2m_{x}+ 0.625e_{x}) = 2(52) + 0.625(60) + 60 + 1 x (2 x 52 + 0.625 x 60) = 324.25 mm - Group end yielding; l
_{eff}= 2m_{x}+ 0.625e_{x}+ 0.5(n – 1)p = 2(52) + 0.625(60) + (0.5 x 2 x 190) = 331.5 mm

**Circular patterns**

- Individual circular yielding; l
_{eff,cp}= nπm_{x }= 3 x - Individual end yielding; l
_{eff,cp}= 0.5n(πm_{x}+ 2e) = 1.5(π x 52 + 2 x 60) = 425 mm

The minimum is l_{eff,1} = 250 mm

M_{Pl,1,Rd} = (0.25∑l_{eff,1}t_{bp}^{2}f_{ybp})/γ_{M0} = [(0.25 x 250 x 50^{2} x 255)/1.0] x 10^{-6} = 39.84 kNm

F_{T,1-2,Rd} = 2M_{Pl,1,Rd}/m = (2 x 39.84)/0.052 = 1532.3 kN

F_{t,3,Rd} = ∑F_{t,Rd}

For class 8.8. M24 bolts; F_{t,Rd} = 203 kN

F_{t,3,Rd} = 3 x 203 = 609 kN

F_{t,pl,Rd} = F_{t,Rd }= min{F_{T,1-2,Rd}; F_{T,3,Rd}} = min{1532.3; 609} = 609 kN

N_{LT} = 585.42 kN < F_{t,pl,Rd} = 609 kN Okay.

**WELD DESIGN ****Welds to the tension flange**

The maximum tensile design force is significantly less than the resistance of the flange, so a full-strength weld is not required. The design force for the weld may be taken as that determined between column and base plate in STEP 1, i.e. 498 kN (N_{L,f})

For a fillet weld with s = 12 mm, a = 8.4 mm

The design resistance due to transverse force is:

F_{nw,Rd} = (Kaf_{u}/√3)/β_{w}γ_{M2}

where K = 1.225, f_{u} = 410 N/mm^{2} and β_{w} = 0.85 (using the properties of the material with the lower strength grade – the base plate)

F_{nw,Rd} = [(1.225 x 8.4 x 410) / √3]/(0.85 x 1.25) = 2.29 kN/mm

Length of weld, assuming a fillet weld all round the flange:

For simplicity, two weld runs will be assumed, along each face of the column flange. Conservatively, the thickness of the web will be deducted from the weld inside the flange. An allowance equal to the leg length will be deducted from each end of each weld run.

L = (261.3 – 2 x 12) + (261.3 – 12 – 4 x 12) = 438.6 mm

F_{t,weld,Rd} = 2.29 x 438.6 = 1004 kN, > 498 kN – Satisfactory

**Welds to the compression flange**

With a sawn end to the column, the compression force may be assumed to be transferred in bearing. There is no design situation with moment in the opposite direction, so there should be no tension in the right hand flange. Only a nominal weld is required. Commonly, both flanges would have the same size weld.

**Welds to the web**

Although the web weld could be smaller, sufficient to resist the design shear, it would generally be convenient to continue the flange welds around the entire perimeter of the column.

Hanger balding

Good work Eng.

i have learnt of your elaborate work of recent and excellent simplification