Gravity actions are normally used for verification of portal frames for lateral, buckling, and torsional stability. Elastic analysis and design of portal frames is permitted by Eurocode 3, and the most significant load case (from experience) is the situation where the frame is subjected to gravity load from permanent actions and variable actions, taking into account the second order effects and imperfection. The load combination used for this is usually of the form shown in Equation (1);

*p* *= 1.35g*_{k}* + 1.5q*_{k} (1)

In the past we have solved the problem two hinged portal frames which are statically determinate due to the presence of internal hinge at the apex. But it is not a very practical scenario as portal frames are required to be rigid in order to be stable. In this post, we are going to show how you can obtain the effects of actions (bending moment, shear force, and axial force) for a rigid portal frame subjected to an ultimate limit state load of 12 kN/m as shown in Figure 1. We will assume that the same universal beam section will be used for the column and for the rafter (EI = Constant).

A little consideration will show that the frame shown in Figure 1 is statically indeterminate to the first order. Therefore, using force method of analysis, we will need to reduce the structure to a basic system. This is basically a process by which we remove the redundants (excess reactive forces) in the structure, in order to make it statically determinate. As a matter of fact, the basic system adopted must be also be stable. This is shown in Figure 2.

To proceed, we will now assign a unit force to the removed redundant horizontal reaction, and plot the bending moment diagram due to the unit force on the basic system as shown in Figure 3.

Since there is no other redundant, we can apply the external load on the basic system. Due to symmetry of the structure and the loading, we can verify that the vertical support reactions at A and E are given as shown in Figure 4;

A_{y} = E_{y} = (12 x 18)/2 = 108 kN

On observing Figure 4, we can see that there will be no bending moment in sections A-B and D-E, rather they will be subjected to compressive axial force of 108 kN. For member B-C, bending moment will induced due to the reactive force and the externally applied uniformly distributed load. The free body diagram of member B-C is shown in Figure 5.

We can verify that the geometrical properties of B-C are as follows;

The angle of inclination β = tan^{-1}(1.5/9) = 9.462º

The length of the member z = √(1.5^{2} + 9^{2}) = 9.124 m

The equation for the bending moment of the section can be given by;

M*z* = [108 x cos(β) x *z*] – [12 x cos(β) x *z*^{2}]/2

M*z* = 106.53*z* – 5.918*z*^{2}

At z = 9.124 m

M_{C}^{L} = 106.53(9.124) – 5.918(9.124)^{2} = 479.32 kNm

The same thing is also happening at section C-D, and the bending moment diagram of the structure is shown in Figure 6

The cannonical equation for the structure is given by Equation (2);

δ_{11}X_{1} + Δ_{1P} = 0 (2)

Where;

δ_{11} = Deflection at point 1 due to unit force at point 1

X_{1} = The actual external reaction at point 1 in the direction of the deflection due to externally applied load

Δ_{1P} = Deflection at point 1 due to externally applied load

We are going to evaluate δ_{11} and Δ_{1P} according to Vereshchagin’s rule which involves combining of the bending moment diagrams. For another example on how to apply Vereshchagin’s rule, click here.

**Evaluation of δ**_{11}** **

In this case, the bending moment diagram of the unit force will combine with itself.

δ_{11} = 2 x [1/3 x 8 x 8 x 8] + 2 x 1/3 x [(8 x 8) + (9.5 x 8) + (9.5 x 9.5)] x 9.124 = 1741.867/EI

**Evaluation of Δ**_{1P}** **

Here, the bending moment diagram due to the unit force will combine with the bending moment diagram due to the externally applied load as shown in Figure 8.

Δ_{1P} = 2 x (1/12) x 479.32 x [(5 x 9.5) + (3 x 8)] x 9.124 = 52115.345

Substituting back into the canonical equation;

X_{1} = 52115.345/1741.867 = 29.919 kN (This obviously represents the horizontal reactions A_{x} and E_{x})

The final bending moment diagram can be obtained therefore as follows;

M_{def} = M_{1}X_{1} + M_{0}

M_{A} = M_{E} = 0

M_{B} = M_{D} = (29.919 x -8) + 0 = -239.352 kNm

M_{C} = (29.919 x -9.5) + 479.32 = 195.089 kNm

The bending moment diagram is shown in Figure 9, and the shear and axial forces can also be obtained accordingly.

Thank for visiting Structville today… Please check back for more updates.

Good afternoon sir! This article was helpful.. I’m an undergraduate, currently writing a project on effect of seismic load on portal frames, multistorey building and telecommunication mast. Sir don’t know if you can put out material or give references that can help.