Cantilever stairs are a unique type of staircase where one end of the tread is rigidly supported by a beam or reinforced concrete wall, and the other end free. By implication, one end of the tread of the cantilever staircase appears to be floating in the air without support.

The design and construction of a cantilever staircase are expected to maintain and/or enhance the aesthetic appeal, while at the same time, ensuring that the staircase satisfies ultimate and serviceability limit state requirements.

The design of cantilever stairs, therefore, involves the selection of the adequate size of the supporting beams/walls, treads, and other accessories to support the anticipated load on the staircase and to also ensure the good performance of the staircase while in service. For reinforced concrete spine beams, the dimensions and reinforcements provided must satisfy all design requirements, while for steel spine beams, the section selected must satisfy all the requirements.

Moreover, the thickness of the tread must be adequate such that it does not undergo excessive vibration, cracking, deflection, or failure. The tread can be made of reinforced/precast concrete, timber, steel, glass, or composite sections.

Structurally, there are two variations of cantilever staircases;

(a) Cantilever staircase supported by a central spine beam

(b) Cantilever staircase supported by a side spandrel beam or RC Wall

In the first case, the spine beam of the staircase is placed at the centre of the tread, with the two ends of the tread hanging free. In the second case, only one end of the tread is fixed to an adjacent wall where the spandrel beam is hidden to support the treads, and the other end is free. Alternatively, if the wall is a reinforced concrete wall, spandrel beams will no longer be required. Therefore, the latter has a longer moment arm than the former.

For the design of cantilever staircases, the use of uniformly distributed live loads should not be employed. Rather, the concentrated loads provided in Table 6.2 of EN 1991-1-1:2002 should be used. According to clause 6.3.1.2(5)P, the concentrated load shall be considered to act at any point on the floor, balcony or stairs over an area with a shape which is appropriate to the use and form of the floor. The shape may be assumed to be a square of 50 mm.

Furthermore, the possibility of upward loading on the cantilever staircase should also be considered.

**Worked Example** **on the Design of Cantilever Stairs**

Design the treads and spine beam of the cantilever staircase in a proposed residential dwelling with the following information;

Width of staircase = 1200 mm

Going (width of riser) = 250 mm

Riser = 150 mm

Thickness of riser = 100 mm

f_{ck} = 25 N/mm^{2}

f_{yk} = 500 N/mm^{2}

**Load Analysis**

For a staircase in a residential dwelling the uniformly distributed live load varies from 2.0 to 4.0 kN/m^{2}, while the concentrated load (which can be used for local verification) varies from 2.0 to 4.0 kN. The exact value can be decided by the National Annex of the country.

**Permanent Actions**

Self weight of thread (UDL) = 25 × 0.1 × 0.25 = 0.625 kN/m

Finishes (allow 1.2 kN/m^{2}) = 1.2 × 0.25 = 0.3 kN/m

Total UDL g_{k} = 0.925 kN/m

Railings (allow) G_{k} = 0.5 kN (Concentrated load)

**Variable Actions**

Allow a variable concentrated load Q_{k} of 3 kN (at the free end)

**Ultimate Limit State**

Permanent load (g_{k}) = 1.35 × 0.925 = 1.25 kN/m

Permanent load (G_{k}) = 1.35 × 0.5 = 0.675 kN

Variable load (Q_{k}) = 1.5 × 3 = 4.5 kN

Maximum design moment (about the centreline of spine beam) = (1.25 × 0.6^{2})/2 + (5.175 × 0.6) = 3.33 kNm

Maximum shear (about the centreline of spine beam) = (1.25 × 0.6) + (5.175) = 5.925 kN

**Flexural Design**

Design bending moment; M = 3.3 kNm

Effective depth of tension reinforcement; d = 68 mm

Redistribution ratio; d = min(M_{neg_red_z3} / M_{neg_z3}, 1) = 1.000

K = M / (b × d^{2} × f_{ck}) = 0.115

K’ = 0.207

K’ > K – No compression reinforcement is required

Lever arm; z = min(0.5 × d × [1 + (1 – 2 × K / (h × a_{cc} / γ_{C}))^{0.5}], 0.95 × d) = 60 mm

Depth of neutral axis; x = 2 × (d – z) / λ = 20 mm

Area of tension reinforcement required; A_{s,req} = M / (f_{yd} × z) = 127 mm^{2}

Tension reinforcement provided; 3H12 A_{s,prov} = 339 mm^{2}

Minimum area of reinforcement – exp.9.1N; A_{s,min} = max(0.26 × f_{ctm} / f_{yk}, 0.0013) × b × d = 23 mm^{2}

Maximum area of reinforcement – cl.9.2.1.1(3); A_{s,max} = 0.04 × b × h = 1000 mm^{2}*PASS* – Area of reinforcement provided is greater than area of reinforcement required

**Crack control**

Maximum crack width; w_{k} = 0.3 mm

Design value modulus of elasticity reinf – 3.2.7(4); E_{s} = 200000 N/mm^{2}

Mean value of concrete tensile strength; f_{ct,eff} = f_{ctm} = 2.6 N/mm^{2}

Stress distribution coefficient; k_{c} = 0.4

Non-uniform self-equilibrating stress coefficient; k = min(max(1 + (300 mm – min(h, b)) × 0.35 / 500 mm, 0.65), 1) = 1.00

Actual tension bar spacing; s_{bar} = 93 mm

Maximum stress permitted – Table 7.3N; s_{s} = 326 N/mm^{2}

Steel to concrete modulus of elast. ratio; a_{cr} = E_{s} / E_{cm} = 6.35

Distance of the Elastic NA from bottom of beam; y = (b × h^{2} / 2 + A_{s,prov} × (a_{cr} – 1) × (h – d)) / (b × h + A_{s,prov} × (a_{cr} – 1)) = 49 mm

Area of concrete in the tensile zone; A_{ct} = b × y = 12195 mm^{2}

Minimum area of reinforcement required – exp.7.1; A_{sc,min} = k_{c} × k × f_{ct,eff} × A_{ct} / s_{s} = 38 mm^{2}

PASS – Area of tension reinforcement provided exceeds minimum required for crack control

Quasi-permanent moment; M_{QP} = 1.0 kNm

Permanent load ratio; R_{PL} = M_{QP} / M = 0.30

Service stress in reinforcement; s_{sr} = f_{yd} × A_{s,req} / A_{s,prov} × R_{PL} = 49 N/mm^{2}

Maximum bar spacing – Tables 7.3N; s_{bar,max} = 300 mm

PASS – Maximum bar spacing exceeds actual bar spacing for crack control

**Deflection control **

Reference reinforcement ratio; ρ_{m0} = (f_{ck})^{0.5} / 1000 = 0.00500

Required tension reinforcement ratio; ρ_{m} = A_{s,req} / (b × d) = 0.00748

Required compression reinforcement ratio; ρ’_{m} = A_{s2,req} / (b × d) = 0.00000

Structural system factor – Table 7.4N; K_{b} = 0.4

Basic allowable span to depth ratio ; span_to_depth_{basic} = K_{b} × [11 + 1.5 × (f_{ck})^{0.5} × ρ_{m0} / (ρ_{m} – ρ’_{m}) + (f_{ck})^{0.5} × (ρ’_{m} / ρ_{m0})^{0.5} / 12] = 6.404

Reinforcement factor – exp.7.17; K_{s} = min(A_{s,prov} / A_{s,req} × 500/ f_{yk}, 1.5) = 1.500

Flange width factor; F1 = 1.000

Long span supporting brittle partition factor; F2 = 1.000

Allowable span to depth ratio; span_to_depth_{allow} = min(span_to_depth_{basic} × K_{s} × F1 × F2, 40 × K_{b}) = 9.606

Actual span to depth ratio; span_to_depth_{actual} = L_{m1_s1} / d = 8.824

**Shear Design**

Using the maximum shear force for all the spans

Support A; V_{Ed } (say) = 6 kN

V_{Rd,c }= [C_{Rd,c.}k. (100ρ_{1} f_{ck})^{1/3} + k_{1}.σ_{cp}]b_{w}.d ≥ (V_{min} + k_{1}.σ_{cp})b_{w}.d

C_{Rd,c} = 0.18/γ_{c} = 0.18/1.5 = 0.12

k = 1 + √(200/d) = 1 + √(200/68) = 2.714 < 2.0, therefore, k = 2.00

V_{min }= 0.035k^{3/2}f_{ck}^{1/2}

V_{min} = 0.035 × 2.00^{3/2} × 25^{1/2} = 0.494 N/mm^{2}

ρ_{1} = A_{s}/bd = 339/(250 × 68) = 0.0199 < 0.02;

σ_{cp} = N_{Ed}/A_{c} < 0.2f_{cd }

(Where N_{Ed} is the axial force at the section, A_{c} = cross sectional area of the concrete), f_{cd} = design compressive strength of the concrete.) Take N_{Ed }= 0

V_{Rd,c} = [0.12 × 2 × (100 × 0.0199 × 25 )^{1/3}] × 250 × 68 = 15005.755 N = 15 kN

Since V_{Rd,c} (15 kN) < V_{Ed} (6 kN), No shear reinforcement is required.

However, nominal shear reinforcement can be provided as H8 @ 150 c/c.

**Summary of the tread (going) design**

Thickness = 100 mm

Reinforcement = 3H12 (Top and Bottom)

Links = H8 @ 150 c/c.

**Design of the Spine Beam**

To design the spine beam, it is very important to transfer the load from the treads to the top of the spine beam. In other words, the spine beam will be subjected to its self-weight and the load from the treads. It will be very important to also consider the effects of asymmetric loading (when the live load is acting only on side of the staircase). This can lead to the development of torsional stresses on the beam.

Ultimate limit state load transferred from treads to beam = 6 kN + 6 kN = 12 kN (concentrated loads)

Load transferred from the landing area (say) = 5 kN/m

Width of spine beam = 225 mm

Depth = 300 mm

Self weight of spine beam (drop) = 1.35 × 25 × 0.225 × 0.3 = 2.278 kN/m

Self weight of the stepped area = 1.35 × 0.5 × 0.15 × 0.225 = 0.02278 kN/m

Total uniformly distributed load on the flight = 2.3 kN/m

Total uniformly distributed load on the landing = 2.278 + 5 = 7.278 kN/m

The spine beam was loaded as shown below;

The analysis results are shown below;

**Flexural Design**

Design bending moment; M = 26.9 kNm

Effective depth of tension reinforcement; d = 264 mm

K = M / (b × d^{2} × f_{ck}) = 0.086

K’ = 0.207

K’ > K – No compression reinforcement is required

Lever arm; z = min(0.5 × d × [1 + (1 – 2 × K / (h × a_{cc} / γ_{C}))^{0.5}], 0.95 × d) = 242 mm

Depth of neutral axis; x = 2 × (d – z) / λ = 54 mm

Area of tension reinforcement required; A_{s,req} = M / (f_{yd} × z) = 255 mm^{2}

Tension reinforcement provided; 2H16 A_{s,prov} = 402 mm^{2}

Minimum area of reinforcement – exp.9.1N; A_{s,min} = max(0.26 × f_{ctm} / f_{yk}, 0.0013) × b × d = 77 mm^{2}

Maximum area of reinforcement – cl.9.2.1.1(3); A_{s,max} = 0.04 × b × h = 2700 mm^{2}*PASS *– Area of reinforcement provided is greater than area of reinforcement required

**Shear Design**

Angle of comp. shear strut for maximum shear; θ_{max} = 45 deg

Strength reduction factor – cl.6.2.3(3); v_{1} = 0.6 × (1 – f_{ck} / 250) = 0.552

Compression chord coefficient – cl.6.2.3(3); α_{cw} = 1.00

Minimum area of shear reinforcement – exp.9.5N; A_{sv,min} = 0.08 N/mm^{2} × b × (f_{ck})^{0.5} / f_{yk} = 161 mm^{2}/m

Design shear force at support ; V_{Ed,max} = V_{Ed,max_s1} = 54 kN

Min lever arm in shear zone; z = 242 mm

Maximum design shear resistance – exp.6.9; V_{Rd,max} = α_{cw} × b × z × v_{1} × f_{cwd} / (cot(θ_{max}) + tan(θ_{max})) = 201 kN

*PASS* – Design shear force at support is less than maximum design shear resistance

Design shear force ; V_{Ed} = 54 kN

Design shear stress; v_{Ed} = V_{Ed} / (b × z) = 0.994 N/mm^{2}

Angle of concrete compression strut – cl.6.2.3; θ = min[max(0.5 × sin^{-1}(min(2 × v_{Ed} / (a_{cw} × f_{cwd} × v_{1}),1)), 21.8 deg), 45deg] = 21.8 deg

Area of shear reinforcement required – exp.6.8; A_{sv,des} = v_{Ed} × b / (f_{yd} × cot(θ)) = 206 mm^{2}/m

Area of shear reinforcement required; A_{sv,req} = max(A_{sv,min}, A_{sv,des}) = 206 mm^{2}/m

Shear reinforcement provided; 2H8 @ 175 c/c

Area of shear reinforcement provided; A_{sv,prov} = 574 mm^{2}/m*PASS* – Area of shear reinforcement provided exceeds minimum required

Maximum longitudinal spacing – exp.9.6N; s_{vl,max} = 0.75 × d = 198 mm

**EXTRA:**

The structural analysis result revealed a high compressive axial load on the spline beam. As a result, it will be important to check the interaction of bending moment and axial force, as typically will be done in the design of reinforced concrete columns. This was checked and found satisfactory.

Furthermore, the possibility of a torsional moment on the spline beam when the live load is asymmetrically loaded should also be checked.

I need complete design of those stairs

This guide about cantilever stairs is really amazing. This is helpful.